← back to ranking

CDW · CDW Corporation

Information Technology Services · mkt cap $17.8B · calls: Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
64.0 conviction · conf-adj 63

conf 5/10 partial

enthusiasm:27.0 · trend:8 · quantifies:5 · impact:0 · under_radar:14 · credibility:0 · business_impact:4 · disruption:-6 · commitment:6 · confirmation:6

Enthusiasm latest 9 / prev 8 (rising)

CDW's AI thesis has moved from early broad-based opportunity to production deployment, with AI driving infrastructure demand, services attach, partner relevance, and internal productivity. Credibility improved in Q1 FY2026 because management cited a nearly 8-figure AI factory deal and $100 million to $200 million of expected run rate improvements, but most revenue impact is still described qualitatively or embedded across broader hardware, cloud, software, and services categories.

GROUNDED NEXT-FY IMPACT vs CONSENSUS

Grounded on actual base — revenue $22.4B · net income $1.1B · net margin 4.8% · diluted EPS 8.08

These are next-fiscal-year annual uplift estimates, not next-quarter numbers.

Aggregate next-FY est. rev uplift: 0.0% · next-FY EPS uplift: 1.5% · vs analysts: inline · priced in: low (model's call-read: medium; verdict above is the hard-data one used for ranking) · confidence: 5/10

ClaimFigureArithmeticNext-FY Rev %Next-FY EPS %
Nearly 8-figure AI factory deal
revenue
~$9-10M deal/bookings"Nearly 8-figure" ~$9-10M. Bookings != revenue: recognizing only the portion converting next FY. X took full ~$9M (0.04% of $22,424M); Y took ~50% conversion ~$5M (0.0223%). Averaged -> ~0.031%. Supplier-side single non-recurring engagement, excluded from adopter headline. EPS impact negligible (~0.02% at current margin)0.0310.022
Geared for Growth run-rate improvement $100-200M
cost
$100M-$200M by 2027/28Midpoint $150M pre-tax, a 2027/28 run-rate. Sized off mandated ADJUSTED NI base $1,306M (not depressed GAAP). Reinvestment ~half retained (~55%); next-FY 2026 captures only back-half ramp (~30%): 150*0.30*0.55=$24.75M pre-tax -> *(1-0.21)=$19.6M after-tax / $1,306M = ~1.5%. Full run-rate ~5.0% by 2027/281.5
Reinvestment ~half of run-rate
cost
upwards of half, a little lessModifier applied inside Geared for Growth (retain ~55%); no independent impact, nulled to avoid double-count
Cloud ~half of GP growth, partly AI
revenue · soft
~half of Q4 GP growth, 'in part' AINo disclosed Q4 GP-growth $ and AI share unquantified ('in part'); cannot isolate AI-attributable cloud revenue from inputs
90-day customer payback on AI deployment
other · soft
potential 90-day paybackCustomer ROI / sales value-prop, not a CDW revenue/cost/margin figure; no anchor to CDW financials or take-rate

Assumptions: Adjusted earnings base = $1,306M (consensus FY2025 NI), matching consensus non-GAAP EPS basis per EARNINGS BASIS rule; GAAP $1,067M/$8.08 is depressed so not used as the EPS denominator. Tax 21%. Geared for Growth = pre-tax operating run-rate ($100-200M, midpoint $150M, 2027/28); reinvestment 'upwards of half, a little less' -> retain ~55%; FY2026 ('next FY') gets only back-half ramp ~30%. 8-figure AI-factory deal ~$9-10M treated as supplier-side bookings, only partial next-FY conversion. AI-factory/cloud product sales = supplier-side; Geared for Growth = adopter-side margin program. Aggregate adopter EPS uses net-of-reinvestment Geared for Growth only (no double-count).

Top line: Negligible quantifiable adopter top-line (~0%). The only anchored revenue is supplier-side: the ~$9-10M 8-figure AI-factory deal (~0.03% of $22.4B, largely one-time) and the unquantified cloud-GP comment ('roughly half of growth,' AI only 'in part'). CDW's adopter-side AI story is a margin story, not a revenue story.

Bottom line: Geared for Growth is the only sizable anchored item: $100-200M run-rate by 2027/28, ~half reinvested -> ~$65M after-tax -> ~5.0% of $1,306M adjusted NI at full run-rate. FY2026 ('next FY') captures only the back-half ramp (~30%) -> ~$19.6M after-tax -> ~1.5% EPS. Thin-margin caveat does not bite because sizing uses the adjusted ~5.8% base, not depressed GAAP.

Consensus already bakes in FY26 revenue 23,506M vs 22,424M = +4.8% and adjusted EPS 10.705 vs 9.892 = +8.2% (NI 1,425M vs 1,306M = +9.1%). The next-FY adopter benefit (~1.5% EPS from the back-half Geared-for-Growth ramp) is small relative to the +8% already embedded, and the program is publicly guided, so likely already largely inside consensus. The fuller ~5% EPS run-rate is real but distant (2027/28) and reinvestment-dependent. Math points roughly in line with, not clearly above, the consensus trajectory.

MODEL CONSENSUS (impact)

partial

Agree on side=both, inline verdict, ~0% adopter topline, conf 5. Reconciled EPS to adjusted base (1.5%) and averaged tiny supplier rev.

Conflicts reconciled
FieldOpus 4.8GPT-5.5
Rev uplift %0.00
EPS uplift %1.51.389
Priced inmediumhigh
vs analystsinlineinline
Confidence55
Top lineNegligible quantifiable adopter top-line. The only anchored revenue items are supplier-side (the ~$9M 8-figure AI-factory deal = 0.04% of $22.4B, and a one-off, not a run-rate) and the cloud-GP comment which is unquantified ('roughly half of growth,' AI only 'in part'). CDW's adopter-side AI story is a margin story, not a revenue story — adopter top-line uplift rounds to ~0%.Adopter-side next-FY revenue uplift is 0.0%; the only anchored revenue item is supplier-side AI factory revenue at about $5M recognized next FY, or 0.0223% of current revenue.
Bottom lineGeared for Growth is the only sizable anchored item: $100-200M run-rate by 2027/28, ~half reinvested -> ~$65M after-tax -> ~5.0% of $1,306M adjusted NI at full run-rate. But that is a 2027/28 figure; FY2026 captures only the back-half ramp (assume ~30%) -> ~$19.6M after-tax -> ~1.5% EPS. Thin-margin caveat does not bite here because I size off the adjusted ~5.8% base, not the depressed GAAP base.Adopter-side EPS uplift is about 1.389% after assuming $37.5M next-FY Geared for Growth benefit, 50% reinvestment, and 21% tax. Gross before reinvestment would be 2.778%.
ReasoningConsensus already bakes in FY26 revenue 23,506M vs 22,424M = +4.8% and adjusted EPS 10.705 vs 9.892 = +8.2% (NI 1,425M vs 1,306M = +9.1%). The next-FY adopter benefit (~1.5% EPS from the back-half Geared-for-Growth ramp) is small relative to that +8% already embedded, and the program is publicly guided, so it is likely already inside consensus. The fuller ~5% EPS run-rate is real upside but distant (2027/28) and reinvestment-dependent. Math points roughly in line with, not clearly above, the consensus trajectory.Consensus 2026 revenue is $23.5061B vs current $22.4241B, a $1.08197B increase or 4.8266% growth. Consensus EPS is $10.70517 vs current $8.08, a 32.4897% increase. The adopter aggregate is 0.0% revenue and 1.389% EPS, far inside the consensus EPS growth trajectory; supplier-side anchored revenue adds only 0.0223%.

Rows highlighted where the two models disagreed.

QUANTIFICATIONS
AI factory engagement deal size: nearly 8-figure deal (Q1 FY2026 recent engagement, both)
“The comprehensive solution delivered a production-ready platform that provided greater customer control over data, cost and governance and generated a nearly 8-figure deal, which included a significant professional services component.”
Geared for Growth run rate improvements: $100 million to $200 million (2027 and 2028, bottomline)
“As we look forward into 2027 and 2028, we would anticipate run rate improvements in the range of $100 million to $200 million.”
Geared for Growth reinvestment share: upwards of half, maybe a little bit less (2027 and 2028, bottomline)
“Now as you noted, some of that will get reinvested. I would say, upwards of half, maybe a little bit less there.”
cloud gross profit contribution tied partly to AI demand: roughly half of the quarter's gross profit growth (Q4 FY2025, both)
“Cloud remains a major engine of performance contributing roughly half of the quarter's gross profit growth. Both cloud revenue and gross profit rose at strong double-digit rates fueled in part by accelerating demand for cloud-enabled AI solutions.”
enterprise AI deployment customer ROI: potential ninety-day payback (Q4 FY2025 customer example, topline)
“The solution improves total cost of ownership with a potential ninety-day payback, dramatically increases developer agility, and reduces long-term regulatory and data governance risk.”
PAST (realized)
CURRENT (now)
FORWARD (guidance)
TRACK RECORD — PROMISE vs DELIVERY

/100 (no quantified promises)   no-quantified-promises  6 calls reviewed

Across all six calls CDW discusses AI extensively but only as a reseller/integrator theme — customer case studies (e.g. eight-figure AI factory builds), an 'AI Center of Excellence,' embedding AI into operations, and the 'Geared for Growth' modernization initiative — never as a forward, self-quantified AI target with both a number and a date. The only numeric guidance (low-single-digit IT market growth, ~200-300bps CDW outperformance) is general company guidance, not an AI-specific promise, so there is no quantified AI promise to audit for delivery.

PRICED-IN (REFINED)
LOW (room left)

Est. revisions flat  ·  Fwd P/E 14.9  ·  EV/Sales 1.0x

AI claim maps to Services, Software Products, Total Hardware

Estimate signals look flat overall: ratings show only a small mix improvement, price targets are flat month-over-quarter and below the last-year average, and FY revenue/EPS growth is modest rather than accelerating sharply. Valuation is not stretched for a mature IT services/reseller model, with a 14.9x forward P/E and about 1.0x EV/Sales. AI upside would most plausibly show up in Services, Software Products, and Total Hardware, but the market does not appear to be paying a rich multiple or aggressively raising estimates for that exposure. Because rising estimates would make the stock more priced-in and that is not clearly happening here, the priced-in verdict is low.
COVERAGE — ENTHUSIASM TRAJECTORY + CATALYSTS
6Q4 FY20247Q1 FY20253Q2 FY20258Q3 FY20258Q4 FY20259Q1 FY2026

AI enthusiasm across 6 calls — trend ↗ rising

AI moved from vertical solutions and services capability to a central growth, infrastructure demand, sales productivity, and operating strategy.

RECENT AI CATALYSTS & NEWS
BUSINESS IMPACT - QUALITATIVE MATERIALITY

6/10 qualitative impact   moderate  medium-term · mixed evidence

Where AI matters: sales productivity, operating leverage, AI services attach

CDW has real internal AI deployment through sales-assist workflows, agentic RFP tooling, and Geared for Growth, with a guided $100M-$200M 2027/28 run-rate improvement. But much of the louder AI revenue story is selling infrastructure and integration into customer AI buildouts, so adopter-side upside looks more like meaningful operating leverage than transformation.

Caveats: AI revenue may be mostly pass-through hardware demand with limited margin capture; Geared for Growth savings may be reinvested or take longer than guided; GenAI could compress pricing for lower-end IT services and support work; Customer AI projects may remain lumpy and vendor-dependent

AI DISRUPTION / CANNIBALIZATION RISK  two-sided · 4/10

AI can pressure parts of CDW's professional services, customer-care implementation, advisory, and integration labor by reducing billable hours or making some solutioning more self-serve. The core reseller/VAR model remains durable because AI also increases infrastructure complexity, vendor orchestration needs, and services attach, so the threat is real but not dominant.

OPTIONS / MARKET STRUCTURE

option liquidity: good

ATM IV
TYPICAL BID-ASK
OPEN INTEREST

proxy inputs — dollar-ADV $260M · beta 1.035 · px $139.72

source: proxy (no options chain on FMP)
FMP /stable/ exposes no options-chain endpoint on this key, so ATM IV, bid-ask spread and open interest are unavailable. Liquidity below is a PROXY from dollar-ADV, beta and price level (a stand-in for option depth), not measured option-market data.

CONFIRMATION — INSIDERS · 13F · LANGUAGE
Confirming — insiders buying, institutions adding, management language 7/10 committed.
INSIDERS buying 2 open-market buy(s) vs 1 sell(s) — net accumulation
INSTITUTIONS (13F) adding as of 2026-03-31: 109 new / 156 closed positions; 397 increased / 258 reduced; institutional ownership +0.76pp; -46 net 13F holders
MGMT LANGUAGE 7/10 committed Clear ownership and firm embedding language, with some qualification around timing and benefit ramp.
commit “AI is an operating capability at CDW, not a bolt-on, and it is being embedded across how we operate, how we sell and the solutions we deliver.”
commit “During the quarter, we furthered our progress embedding AI into our go-to-market motions with our CDW Assist Super Agent”
hedge “We expect the benefits from Geared for Growth enterprise initiatives to begin flowing through in the back half of this year, building over time.”
VERBATIM AI QUOTES
“Excellent top line performance reflected agility both in securing supply and capturing demand for AI investment and ongoing infrastructure modernization.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“At the core of our growth strategy is a clear shift we are seeing from customers moving beyond interest in AI to a focus on how to put it to work in real environments at scale and with measurable business impact.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“We are building CDW to be AI first and outcome obsessed.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“AI-driven enhancements across how we sell and operate include coworker AI fluency, deeper data integration and platform readiness and productivity gains from tools such as Agentic RFP capabilities.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“During the quarter, we furthered our progress embedding AI into our go-to-market motions with our CDW Assist Super Agent, which helps sales professionals prioritize opportunities and engage customers more effectively through insight-driven AI-supported workflows.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“Geared for Growth is translating AI-enabled productivity into operating leverage, supporting margin discipline while providing investment capacity to sustain scalable growth.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“AI adoption is a compute-intensive shift that increases both services intensity and hardware relevance.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“The comprehensive solution delivered a production-ready platform that provided greater customer control over data, cost and governance and generated a nearly 8-figure deal, which included a significant professional services component.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“AI is not only increasing wallet share, it's also bringing new customers to CDW.”
— Christine Leahy, Q1 FY2026
“In addition to the normal level of increased incentives related to higher gross profit achievement and seasonally higher Q1 expenses, we are also investing in productivity enablement in the form of AI tools and training that will lead to an enhanced expense efficiency in the second half of the year and beyond.”
— Albert Miralles, Q1 FY2026
“As we look forward into 2027 and 2028, we would anticipate run rate improvements in the range of $100 million to $200 million.”
— Albert Miralles, Q1 FY2026
“Both cloud revenue and gross profit rose at strong double-digit rates fueled in part by accelerating demand for cloud-enabled AI solutions.”
— Christine A. Leahy, Q4 FY2025
“And AI plays directly to our strengths.”
— Christine A. Leahy, Q4 FY2025
“Our AI offering spans strategy, data modernization, GenAI integration, and automation.”
— Christine A. Leahy, Q4 FY2025
“While still early, AI momentum is building across every market we serve.”
— Christine A. Leahy, Q4 FY2025
“But with AI embedded across the entire stack, a key part of our AI story is that AI is not a discrete contributor. It is a pervasive one.”
— Christine A. Leahy, Q4 FY2025
ANALYST QUESTIONS ON AI
Q (Q1 FY2026, Margaret Nolan): You gave several interesting AI examples. And I'm wondering at a portfolio level, how are you assessing whether AI-driven deals differ on a gross margin basis in terms of the services attach rate versus some of your more traditional infrastructure transactions? And just overall, should we think about AI as margin neutral or accretive or dilutive over time?
A: I would say that the AI deals per se have a couple of components that make margin accretive. higher-value services attach and continuing recurring revenues. And overall, that's a larger sized deal typically and a higher margin deal. I think what we're going to see is AI is, as we all know, becoming ubiquitous and embedded across every component of the stack. And so we're very optimistic about how we can capitalize on that to drive margin accretion going forward.
Q (Q1 FY2026, Adam Tindle): Chris, I just wanted to start on the new initiative that's being announced today. I think you called it Geared for Growth to simplify and rewire the operating model.
A: When I think about geared for growth, it's really driving efficiency, productivity, coworker empowerment. And it's across all the vectors that you would expect. It's our AI tooling, it's our partner relationships, it's the solutions we're developing and driving efficiency and effectiveness across all of those.
Q (Q1 FY2026, Keith Housum): Is the driver of the opportunity for Geared for Growth, is it more of the AI-driven tools and the specification of some of your targeting work there? Is that driving the potential benefits you see about $100 million to $200 million?
A: It certainly is focused on driving effectiveness into our sales and customer-facing organizations, but equally, embedding AI across our core end-to-end processes, which will indeed drive efficiency. In terms of where the specific dollars are coming from, they will be derived both from increased productivity as well as cost savings.
Q (Q4 FY2025, Adam Tindle): Maybe a follow-up for Chris. I know a lot of the investor conversation recently has been around AI and whether or not that's a benefit or headwind to CDW Corporation. Reminds me a little bit of years ago when there were questions around cloud for CDW Corporation.
A: While we're still in the early innings, and you heard me say this, AI momentum is picking up in all of our end markets. And, you know, a slight difference from cloud versus the AI revolution now is cloud was you know, just a consumption model, and AI is embedded across the entire stack. That's changing the entire platform, so to speak.
Q (Q4 FY2025, Ruplu Bhattacharya): What type of work are you seeing are you engaging more with customers on the AI-related projects? Are you seeing small medium business, the middle market customers, are they looking at AI? And is this an area of focus and investment for for CDW Corporation?
A: Yes. It absolutely is. And when you think about that customer set that you just mentioned, those are customers that don't have the resources, the breadth of skills, and capabilities, the access to the partners. And the full kind of end-to-end capabilities and so CDW Corporation has been both investing in over the years, but now highly engaged with customers in the small business space, the mid-market space, and the higher end of the mid-market space as well.
Q (Q4 FY2025, Erik Woodring): Just what do you think can help explain this? Is this just kind of differences in where we are in spending cycles for these cohorts? And what does this mean for kind of these two cohorts as we think about 2026?
A: And now we are actually seeing a number of larger companies who are starting to move into production and starting to spend more in that area. Small business is much more nimble in terms of their ability to adapt adopt AI. They're very cloud forward.